Email this article Rhodobacter capsulatus PG lipopolysaccharide as a potential blocker of Toll-like receptor 2 and 4 activation
- Authors: Zubova S.V.1, Radzyukevich Y.V.1, Kosyakova N.I.2, Prokhorenko I.R.1
-
Affiliations:
- Federal Research Center Pushchino Scientific Center for Biological Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Clinical Hospital at the Pushchino Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: Vol 17, No 1 (2025)
- Pages: 106-109
- Section: Short communications
- Submitted: 06.11.2024
- Accepted: 28.01.2025
- Published: 22.04.2025
- URL: https://actanaturae.ru/2075-8251/article/view/27555
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.32607/actanaturae.27555
- ID: 27555
Cite item
Full Text
ABBREVIATIONS
KDO – 3-deoxy-d-manno-octulosonic acid; LPS – lipopolysaccharide; LTA – lipoteichoic acid; IL – interleukin; MD-2 – myeloid differentiation protein 2; Pam3CSK4 – synthetic triacylated lipopeptide; PAMP – pathogen-associated molecular patterns; TLR – Toll-like receptor; TNF-α – tumor necrosis factor α.
INTRODUCTION
Pathogen recognition by blood cells is the most important stage of an adequate immune response to infection. TLR2 and TLR4 play a key role in inflammation thanks to their ability to identify certain pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) [1]. These receptors also form and interconnect innate and adaptive immune responses. The study of the mechanisms of the functional responses of innate immune cells to different PAMPs is important in developing effective methods against bacterial and viral infections. TLR4 is a receptor specific to lipopolysaccharides (LPSs), which are the basic components of the gram-negative bacterial cell wall [2]. Ligand-specific recognition of TLR2 occurs via its heterodimerization with TLR1 and TLR6. Triacylated lipopeptides induce heterodimerization of TLR2 and TLR1, while TLR2 interacts with TLR6 and CD36 in response to diacylated lipopeptides [3]. Two of the three lipid chains of the triacylated ligand (in particular, Pam3CSK4) interact with TLR2, while the third chain occupies the TLR1 hydrophobic pocket [4]. Since the TLR6 molecule lacks a hydrophobic pocket, the TLR2/TLR6 heterodimer cannot recognize triacylated lipopeptides [5]. The ability of TLR2 to form a complex with either TLR1 or TLR6 opens the door for blood cells to interact with a wider range of microbial products. It also increases the production of proinflammatory cytokines and complicates the pathogenesis of sepsis.
LPS from the phototrophic bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus PG exhibits low endotoxic activity and acts as an endotoxin antagonist [6]. A synthetic analogue of the lipid A of R. capsulatus, namely the drug E5531, is capable of blocking the immunobiological activity of LPSs and lipoteichoic acid (LTA) [7].
The aim of this work is to study the ability of R. capsulatus PG LPS to suppress the activation of innate immune cells by different TLR2 and TLR4 ligands.
EXPERIMENTAL
The studies were carried out using whole blood of conditionally healthy volunteers aged 25 to 30 years. All volunteers provided a written consent to participate in the study. The study protocol complies with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (2013); it was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of the Hospital Pushchino Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences (No. 2 dated 10.04.2014). Peripheral blood was collected using vacutainers (Becton, Dickinson and Company, UK) treated with sodium heparin (17 u/ml) in the clinical setting.
Blood cell activation by LPS, LTA, and Pam3CSK4
To study the effect of LPS, LTA, and Pam3CSK4 on cytokine synthesis, whole blood was diluted in a RPMI 1640 medium at a ratio of 1 : 10 and incubated in various combinations with E. coli O55:B5 LPS (100 ng/ml), Streptococcus pyogenes LTA (1 000 ng/ml), synthetic lipopeptide Pam3CSK4 (300 ng/ml) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), and R. capsulatus PG LPS (1 000 ng/ml) for 6 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. R. capsulatus PG LPS was obtained according to the previously described method [8]. To determine the antagonistic effect of R. capsulatus PG LPS on agonists, blood was preincubated with R. capsulatus PG LPS for 30 min. After incubation, either LPS, LTA, or Pam3CSK4 was added. Blood cells were then pelleted by centrifugation at 300 g for 10 min. Supernatants were collected and stored at –20°C prior to cytokine assessment.
Cytokine assessment
The cytokine level was evaluated using TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8 ELISA kits (Vector-Best, Russia) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The optical density of the samples was determined at 450 nm on a Stat Fax 3200 microplate reader (Awareness Technology Inc., USA).
Statistical analysis
The statistical analysis and graphical presentation of the results were conducted using nonparametric statistics methods in Origin Pro 7.5 and Microsoft Office Excel 2010 (AtteStat plugin). The results are presented as median values with upper and lower quartiles (IQR). The statistical significance of differences between median values was determined using the Mann–Whitney test (p < 0.05).
RESULTS
The specific receptors TLR2 and TLR4, which provide an adequate immune response to various pathogens, are the most important elements in cytokine synthesis activation. We analyzed the activation of the synthesis of the cytokines TNF-α and IL-6 and chemokine IL-8 by the following TLR2 and TLR4 ligands in human whole blood cells in a single series of experiments: E. coli LPS, S. pyogenes LTA, and Pam3CSK4. Activating ligands stimulated the production of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8 by blood cells at levels significantly above those in the control (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1. Effect of R. capsulatus PG LPS on TNF-α, IL-8, and IL-6 synthesis upon activation of whole blood cells by E. coli LPS, S. pyogenes LTA, and Pam3CSK4, n = 7. *p < 0.05
An increase in TNF-α and IL-8 synthesis was observed in response to S. pyogenes LTA activation; the TNF-α and IL-8 levels were higher compared to those in the cells exposed to E. coli LPS and Pam3CSK4. In other words, the level of cytokines synthesized by the cells decreased in the following order: S. pyogenes LTA > E. coli LPS > Pam3CSK4. R. capsulatus PG LPS at a concentration exceeding that of the E. coli endotoxin and Pam3CSK4 by ten times and thrice, respectively, and at the same concentration as for S. pyogenes LTA did not stimulate TNF-α production in the cells (Fig. 1).
The blood levels of IL-8 and IL-6 increased insignificantly in response to R. capsulatus PG LPS, compared to the control; however, the levels were significantly lower than those in blood cells activated by other ligands.
The study of the ability of R. capsulatus PG LPS to protect cells against the action of E. coli LPS, S. pyogenes LTA, and Pam3CSK4 showed that R. capsulatus PG LPS suppresses TNF-α and IL-6 synthesis in the blood. The suppression of the response decreased in the same order as in the case of blood cell activation by the studied ligands: S. pyogenes LTA > E. coli LPS > Pam3CSK4. In contrast to activation by S. pyogenes LTA and Pam3CSK4, where a significant protective effect of R. capsulatus PG LPS was observed, R. capsulatus PG LPS did not protect blood cells from the activation of IL-8 synthesis by LPS E. coli.
DISCUSSION
In this work, we studied the potential antagonistic activity of LPS from the non-pathogenic bacterium R. capsulatus PG not only against LPS of the gram-negative bacterium E. coli, which is a typical TLR4 agonist, but also against di- and triacylated lipopeptides such as LTA of the gram-positive bacterium S. pyogenes and the synthetic analogue of triacylated lipopeptides Pam3CSK4.
The endotoxic activity of LPSs is determined by the lipid A structure. The number of lipid chains in the structure of lipid A is the most significant factor determining LPS toxicity. It has been previously shown that E5531, a synthetic analogue of lipid A from the phototrophic bacterium R. capsulatus 37b4, blocks the immunobiological activity of E. coli LPS and Staphylococcus faecalis LTA [7]. Unlike E5531, R. capsulatus PG LPS contains not only the atypical lipid A with five truncated fatty acids, including an unsaturated one, but also 3-deoxy-d-manno-octulosonic acid (KDO), an outer core, and O-antigen. The LPS inner core determines not only the LPS biological activity but also the nature of its interaction with the MD-2 protein and TLR4 [9]. For LPS recognition, TLR4 forms a dimer with the membrane protein MD-2, which binds to LPS, forming a complex capable of activating TLR4-positive cells [2]. The R. sphaeroides lipid was shown to occupy the entire MD-2 hydrophobic pocket, thus forming the MD-2/lipid A complex, whose stability mainly owes to the hydrophobic interaction between the lipid A tails and the amino acids of the MD-2 binding groove. Tyr102 may be responsible for the antagonist activity of lipid A due to its inverted position in the MD-2/lipid A complex [10]. MD-2 is also involved in the TLR2-mediated responses of blood cells to the wall components of gram-positive bacterial cells. MD-2 binds to TLR2; however, this binding is weaker than that to TLR4 [11].
To recognize tri- or diacylated lipopeptides, TLR2 forms receptor heterodimers with TLR1 and TLR6 [12]. Atypical LPSs of Legionella pneumophila and Rhizobium spp. induce an inflammatory response most likely via TLR2 than via TLR4 signaling [13]. In our research, we established that R. capsulatus PG LPS blocks the activation of cytokine synthesis in blood cells by not only TLR4 agonists, but also TLR2/6 and TLR2/1 agonists. This seems to indicate that, because of the specific composition and structure of lipid A, R. capsulatus PG LPS can bind not only to TLR4, but also to TLR2. Apparently, in contrast to classical agonists, the lipid A structure of R. capsulatus PG does not stimulate the formation of the (TLR4)2 homodimer or the complexes TLR2/TLR1 and TLR2/TLR6 required for cell activation and subsequent proinflammatory cytokine synthesis. It is possible that R. capsulatus PG LPS forms a TLR2/MD-2/LPSRb complex. This complex then suppresses the formation of the TLR2/6 and TLR2/1 heterocomplexes and the subsequent TLR2-mediated cell activation via LTA and Pam3CSK4, thereby increasing the production of the TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8 cytokines.
Since R. capsulatus PG LPS blocks the activation of TLR4 and TLR2, we cannot exclude the mechanism of antagonistic activity proposed for Ochrobactrum intermedium LPS [14]. This atypical, low-toxicity LPS induces interaction of the TLR4 and TLR2 receptors and formation of the TLR4/TLR2 heterodimer upon blood cell activation. The bacteria R. capsulatus PG and O. intermedium belong to the alpha subgroup of Proteobacteria [15]. LPS from both bacteria show low endotoxic activity. The LPSs of these bacteria are comprised of lipid A containing an unsaturated fatty acid residue, an inner core, an outer core, and the O-antigen. Core saccharides are known to participate in the formation of the low-reactivity TLR2/TLR4/MD-2 complex in response to O. intermedium LPS [14]. It cannot be excluded that an excess of R. capsulatus PG LPS also induces the formation of a low-reactivity TLR4/MD-2/TLR2 complex, which blocks TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8 production in response to E. coli LPS, S. pyogenes LTA, and Pam3CSK4.
CONCLUSION
The results obtained here show that R. capsulatus PG LPS exhibits antagonistic activity against the TLR4 ligands and various TLR2 ligands, including tri- and diacylated lipopeptides. In this work, we proposed possible mechanisms behind the suppressing effect of R. capsulatus PG LPS on TLR2 and TLR4 activation.
R. capsulatus PG LPS can serve as a prototype of drugs against both gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria.
The authors express their gratitude to the Hospital Pushchino Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences for cooperation.
This work was conducted as part of the State Assignments No. 1023033100509-9-1.6.7 and 122041200039-0 from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation at the Institute of Biological Instrumentation and the Institute of Fundamental Problems of Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supplementary files
