Bacteriocin from the Raccoon Dog Oral Microbiota Inhibits the Growth of Pathogenic Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The growing incidence of infections caused by antibiotic-resistant strains of pathogens is one of the key challenges of the 21st century. The development of novel technological platforms based on single-cell analysis of antibacterial activity at the whole-microbiome level enables the transition to massive screening of antimicrobial agents with various mechanisms of action. The microbiome of wild animals remains largely underinvestigated. It can be considered a natural reservoir of biodiversity for antibiotic discovery. Here, the Staphylococcus pseudintermedius E18 strain was isolated from the oral microbiome of a raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) using a microfluidic ultrahigh-throughput screening platform. S. pseudintermedius E18 efficiently inhibited the growth of pathogenic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). It was established that the main active substance of the S. pseudintermedius E18 strain was a bacteriocin with a molecular weight of 27 kDa. The identified bacteriocin had a high positive charge and an extremely narrow spectrum of activity. Bacteriocin S. pseudintermedius E18 was inactivated by elevated temperature, proteinase K, and EDTA. Further investigation on the structure of the bacteriocin produced by S. pseudintermedius E18 will provide a comprehensive understanding of its mechanism of action, which will open up prospects for developing novel DNA-encoded antimicrobials.

Full Text

Searching for novel antimicrobials is essential, since bacteria are constantly evolving and develop resistance to new antibiotics [1]. The application of novel platforms based on the metabolomics, genomic, and transcriptomic sequencing techniques, followed by bioinformatics analysis, as well as the drive toward alternative microbial culture methods offers new opportunities for antibiotic activity screening of naturally occurring substances.

Animal microbiomes are a unique reservoir that can be tapped in the search for novel antimicrobials [2–4]. Probiotic microorganisms are of special interest as potential producers of antibiotics [5, 6]. Although probiotic strains and commensal bacteria can have indirect implications on the microbiome by influencing the host immune system [7] or producing functionally important enzymes [8], the direct pathogen-killing mechanism is typical of most bacteriocins.

Here, we conducted ultra-high-throughput screening of the salivary microbiome of the raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) to isolate strains producing substances exhibiting an antimicrobial activity against S. aureus and identify the metabolites responsible for their antagonistic properties.

Previously, we described a platform for ultra-high-throughput screening of microbial communities (Fig. 1) [2, 9] that was based on cocultivation of individual microbial cells with a reporter pathogen strain in isolated droplets of double emulsion, followed by the isolation of active phenotypes by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. This platform was used to profile the oral microbiome of the raccoon dog and to identify the strains exhibiting an activity against S. aureus.

 

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of an ultra-high-throughput screening platform for selecting microorganisms that inhibit the growth of a target bacterium

 

Screening revealed six phenotypically different strains reproducibly inhibiting the growth of S. aureus on a BHI agar medium and in liquid culture (activity was evaluated using the twofold serial dilution method). The strains were identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MC) (Table 1).

 

Table 1. Mass spectrometric identification and antagonistic activity of the isolated strains against S. aureus

Strain

Microorganism

Growth inhibition zones of S. aureus, diameter, mm

Maximum activity in liquid culture

Inhibitory dilution factor

Cultivation
duration, days

Е14

Bacillus pumilus

11 ± 2

61 ± 9

2

Е18

Staphylococcus pseudintermedius

5 ± 1

256 ± 47

4

Е32

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens

4* ± 1

5 ± 1

2

ЕВ10

Pasteurella dagmatis

0.9 ± 0.1

8 ± 1

8

ЕВ16

Ralstonia insidiosa

3.1 ± 0.4

ЕВ27

Curtobacterium luteum

4 ± 1

1

ЕВ30

Brachybacterium sp.

2.1 ± 0.5

1

*Diffuse zone of inhibition.

 

The S. pseudintermedius Е18 strain exhibited the highest activity against S. aureus in the liquid medium (Fig. 2A). A more detailed analysis of the dynamics of the antagonistic effect of the producer strain was conducted to accumulate and identify the active substance (Fig. 2B).

 

Fig. 2. (A) The phenotype of the E18 producer strain on a BHI agar medium; (B) the dynamics of E18 strain active metabolite production

 

The active substance was purified by solid-phase extraction using a LPS-500 sorbent (Table 2). Most of the substance could not be eluted by increasing the acetonitrile concentration in the buffer solution at pH 5.0; 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in an aqueous acetonitrile solution was used for elution.

 

Table 2. Purification of the substance produced by the E18 strain by pulsed solid-phase extraction using the LPS-500 sorbent

Buffer solution

A

B

A + C, %C

40

70

100

Activity according to inhibitory dilution, % of applied sample

2 ± 1

9 ± 1

12 ± 3

68 ± 7

11 ± 2

Note. Buffer А: 10 mM NH4OAc, 5% acetonitrile, pH 5.0; buffer B: 10 mM NH4OAc, 80% acetonitrile, pH 5.0; buffer C: 0.1% TFA, 80% acetonitrile.

 

As a result of 1.5 h of incubation at 60°C, the substance produced by the E18 strain lost its antibiotic activity. Because of thermal lability and the elution pattern during solid-phase extraction, we assumed it to be a high-molecular-weight substance. Active samples of the culture medium supplemented with 50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.5, were exposed to proteinase K (0.1 mg/mL). After 3 h of incubation at 37°C, the inhibitory activity against S. aureus was completely lost. Since the compound tentatively had a protein nature, the respective methods were used for its further purification.

The first purification stage involved ion exchange chromatography using the SP Sepharose sorbent (Table 3).

 

Table 3. Purification of the substance produced by the E18 strain by cation exchange chromatography using the SP Sepharose sorbent

Content of buffer B, %

0

20

40

60

80

100

Activity according to inhibitory dilution, % of applied sample

6 ± 5

2 ± 1

15 ± 3

26 ± 7

21 ± 5

11 ± 2

Note. Buffer А: 10 mM NH4OAc, pH 6.0; buffer B: 10 mM NH4OAc, 1 M NaCl, pH 6.0. Fractions corresponding to the 60 and 80% of buffer B content (600 and 800 mM NaCl, respectively) were used further in the work.

 

A Heparin Sepharose chromatography column (GE Healthcare, USA) and buffer solutions A (20 мМ HEPES, pH 7.0) and B (20 мМ HEPES, 1 M NaCl, pH 7.0), with a flow rate of 1 mL/min, were used at the second purification stage. Linear gradient elution with buffer B was performed for 20 min (Fig. 3A,B). The retention time indirectly indicated that the protein carried a high positive charge.

 

Fig. 3. Chromatographic purification of the protein responsible for the activity of the S. pseudintermedius E18 strain. Fractions with the highest antistaphylococcal activity are shown in red. (A) Representative chromatogram obtained by fractionation of active metabolites of S. pseudintermedius E18 using a Heparin Sepharose column. (B) Representative 15% SDS-PAGE patterns. Protein purification by chromatography using the SP Sepharose sorbent and subsequent purification using a Heparin Sepharose column. (C) Representative 15% SDS-PAGE pattern. Fractions obtained as a result of protein purification by gel filtration using a Superdex 75 column

 

Size exclusion chromatography using a Superdex 75 column in buffer solution containing 20 mM HEPES and 250 mM NaCl (pH 7.0, flow rate, 0.4 mL/min) was employed at the third purification stage. Activity corresponded to the protein ~ 27 kDa in size (Fig. 3C); retention time was ~ 23 min.

A purified protein was used for the functional studies. The minimum inhibitory concentration of this protein against S. aureus was 0.05 ± 0.02 µg/mL. The resulting bacteriocin was highly specific: its MIC values against Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecium, Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacter cloacae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Bacillus cereus were above 10 µg/mL, indication that it exhibited no antimicrobial activity against these bacteria.

Hence, the S. pseudintermedius strain produces class III bacteriocin, the thermolabile 27 kDa polypeptide inhibiting the growth of bacteria belonging to the genus Staphylococcus [10–12]. Class III bacteriocins include bacteriolysins, tailocins, and nonlytic proteins. Bacteriolysins are the best studied subclass of such organisms. The known members of bacteriolysins are metal-dependent proteases catalyzing the hydrolysis of peptide bridges or stem peptides in peptidoglycan in a target bacterium [12]. A hypothesis was put forward that the protein isolated from S. pseudintermedius is also a peptidoglycan hydrolase. Incubation of the protein in the presence of 10 mM EDTA at 25°C for 15 min rendered it completely inactive. Therefore, the substance mediating the antistaphylococcal activity of the S. pseudintermedius strain is a metal-dependent enzyme, which is typical of bacteriolysins.

CONCLUSIONS

The development of antimicrobial resistance by pathogenic bacteria has revived interest in antimicrobial agents that can target bacterial membranes and cell walls [13]. Ultra-high-throughput screening of the microbiota of a racoon dog uncovered the S. pseudintermedius E18 strain. It was demonstrated by chromatographic fractionation that this strain produces an antimicrobial agent acting as a lytic enzyme.

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (grant No. 19-14-00331).

×

About the authors

M. N. Baranova

Shemyakin–Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: ivansmr@inbox.ru
Россия, Moscow, 117997

E. A. Soboleva

Shemyakin–Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: ivansmr@inbox.ru
Россия, Moscow, 117997

M. A. Kornienko

Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine, Federal Medical Biological Agency

Email: ivansmr@inbox.ru
Россия, Moscow, 119435

M. V. Malakhova

Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine, Federal Medical Biological Agency

Email: ivansmr@inbox.ru
Россия, Moscow, 119435

Yu. A. Mokrushina

Shemyakin–Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences; Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: ivansmr@inbox.ru

Faculty of Chemistry

Россия, Moscow, 117997; Moscow, 119991

A. G. Gabibov

Shemyakin–Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences; Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: ivansmr@inbox.ru

Faculty of Chemistry

Россия, 117997, Moscow; Moscow, 119991

S. S. Terekhov

Shemyakin–Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: ivansmr@inbox.ru
Россия, Moscow, 117997

I. V. Smirnov

Shemyakin–Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences; Lomonosov Moscow State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: ivansmr@inbox.ru

Faculty of Chemistry

Россия, Moscow, 117997; Moscow, 119991

References

  1. https://www.who.int/news/item/27-02-2017-who-publishes-list-of-bacteria-for-which-new-antibiotics-are-urgently-needed.
  2. Terekhov S.S., Smirnov I.V., Malakhova M.V., Samoilov A.E., Manolov A.I., Nazarov A.S., Danilov D.V., Dubiley S.A., Osterman I.A., Rubtsova M.P., et al. // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2018. V. 115. № 38. P. 9551–9556.
  3. Adnani N., Rajski S.R., Bugni T.S. // Nat. Prod. Rep. 2017. V. 34. № 7. P. 784–814.
  4. Akbar N., Siddiqui R., Sagathevan K.A., Khan N.A. // Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019. V. 103. № 10. P. 3955–3964.
  5. Pereira W.A., Mendonça C.M.N., Urquiza A.V., Marteinsson V.Þ., LeBlanc J.G., Cotter P.D., Villalobos E.F., Romero J., Oliveira R.P.S. // Microorganisms. 2022. V. 10. № 9. P. 1705.
  6. Liao S.F., Nyachoti M. // Anim. Nutr. 2017. V. 3. № 4. P. 331–343.
  7. Liang L., Yang C., Liu L., Mai G., Li H., Wu L., Jin M., Chen Y. // Microb. Cell Fact. 2022. V. 21. № 1. P. 88.
  8. El-Saadony M.T., Alagawany M., Patra A.K., Kar I., Tiwari R., Dawood M.A.O., Dhama K., Abdel-Latif H.M.R. // Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2021. V. 117. P. 36–52.
  9. Terekhov S.S., Smirnov I.V., Stepanova A.V., Bobik T.V., Mokrushina Y.A., Ponomarenko N.A., Belogurov A.A., Rubtsova M.P., Kartseva O.V., Gomzikova M.O., et al. // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017. V. 114. № 10. P. 2550–2555.
  10. Meade E., Slattery M.A., Garvey M. // Antibiotics. 2020. V. 9. № 1. P. 32.
  11. Heng N.C.K., Tagg J.R. // Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2006. V. 4. № 2. P. 160.
  12. Zimina M., Babich O., Prosekov A., Sukhikh S., Ivanova S., Shevchenko M., Noskova S. // Antibiotics. 2020. V. 9. № 9. P. 553.
  13. Bush K. // Rev. Sci. Tech. 2012. V. 31. № 1. P. 43–56.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of an ultra-high-throughput screening platform for selecting microorganisms that inhibit the growth of a target bacterium

Download (306KB)
3. Fig. 2. (A) The phenotype of the E18 producer strain on a BHI agar medium; (B) the dynamics of E18 strain active metabolite production

Download (285KB)
4. Fig. 3. Chromatographic purification of the protein responsible for the activity of the S. pseudintermedius E18 strain. Fractions with the highest antistaphylococcal activity are shown in red. (A) Representative chromatogram obtained by fractionation of active metabolites of S. pseudintermedius E18 using a Heparin Sepharose column. (B) Representative 15% SDS-PAGE patterns. Protein purification by chromatography using the SP Sepharose sorbent and subsequent purification using a Heparin Sepharose column. (C) Representative 15% SDS-PAGE pattern. Fractions obtained as a result of protein purification by gel filtration using a Superdex 75 column

Download (409KB)

Copyright (c) 2024 Baranova M.N., Soboleva E.A., Kornienko M.A., Malakhova M.V., Mokrushina Y.A., Gabibov A.G., Terekhov S.S., Smirnov I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies