Acta NaturaeActa NaturaeActa Naturae2075-8251Acta Naturae Ltd1069510.32607/20758251-2011-3-1-69-76ArticlesСтатьиResearch ArticleStructural and Dynamic Study of the Transmembrane Domain of the Amyloid Precursor ProteinStructural and Dynamic Study of the Transmembrane Domain of the Amyloid Precursor ProteinNadezhdinK Dbon@nmr.ruBocharovaO Vbon@nmr.ruBocharovE Vbon@nmr.ruArsenievA Sbon@nmr.ruShemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences1503201131VOL 3, NO1 (2011)ТОМ 3, №1 (2011)697617012020Copyright ©; 2011, Nadezhdin K.D., Bocharova O.V., Bocharov E.V., Arseniev A.S.Copyright ©; 2011, Nadezhdin K.D., Bocharova O.V., Bocharov E.V., Arseniev A.S.2011Nadezhdin K.D., Bocharova O.V., Bocharov E.V., Arseniev A.S.Nadezhdin K.D., Bocharova O.V., Bocharov E.V., Arseniev A.S.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0https://actanaturae.ru/2075-8251/article/view/10695

Alzheimer’s disease affects people all over the world, regardless of nationality, gender or social status. An adequate study of the disease requires essential understanding of the molecular fundamentals of the pathogenesis. The amyloid β-peptide, which forms amyloid plaques in the brain of people with Alzheimer’s disease, is the product of sequential cleavage of a single-span membrane amyloid precursor protein (APP). More than half of the APP mutations found to be associated with familial forms of Alzheimer’s disease are located in its transmembrane domain. The pathogenic mutations presumably affect the structural-dynamic properties of the APP transmembrane domain by changing its conformational stability and/or lateral dimerization. In the present study, the structure and dynamics of the recombinant peptide corresponding to the APP fragment, Gln686-Lys726, which comprises the APP transmembrane domain with an adjacent N-terminal juxtamembrane sequence, were determined in the membrane mimetic environment composed of detergent micelles using NMR spectroscopy. The structure obtained in dodecylphosphocholine micelles consists of two α-helices: a short surface-associated juxtamembrane helix (Lys687-Asp694) and a long transmembrane helix (Gly700-Leu723), both connected via a mobile loop region. A minor bend of the transmembrane α-helix is observed near the paired residues Gly708-Gly709. A cholesterol-binding hydrophobic cavity is apparently formed under the loop region, where the juxtamembrane α-helix comes into contact with the membrane surface near the N-terminus of the transmembrane α-helix.

Alzheimer’s diseaseamyloid precursor proteintransmembrane domainNMR spectroscopyspatial structuredynamicsGrigorenko A.P., Rogaev E.I. // Mol. Biol. (Mosk). 2007. V. 41. P. 331-345.Duce J.A., Tsatsanis A., Cater M.A., James S.A., Robb E., Wikhe K., Leong S.L., Perez K., Johanssen T., Greenough M.A., et al. // Cell. 2010. V. 142. P. 857-867.Rauk A. // Dalton Trans. 2008. V. 14. P. 1273-1282.Selkoe D.J. // Nature. 2003. V. 426. P. 900-904.Steiner H., Fluhrer R., Haass C. // J. Biol. Chem. 2008. V. 283. P. 29627-29631.Soscia S.J., Kirby J.E., Washicosky K.J., Tucker S.M., Ingelsson M., Hyman B., Burton M.A., Goldstein L.E., Duong S., Tanzi R.E., Moir R.D. // PLoS One. 2010. V. 5. P. e9505.Thinakaran G., Koo E.H. // J. Biol. Chem. 2008. V. 283. P. 29615-29619.Wiley J.C., Hudson M., Kanning K.C., Schecterson L.C., Bothwell M. // J. Neurochem. 2005. V. 94. P. 1189-1201.Gorman P.M., Kim S., Guo M., Melnyk R.A., McLaurin J., Fraser P.E., Bowie J.U., Chakrabartty A. // BMC Neuroscience. 2008. V. 9. P. 17-27.Munter L.M., Voigt P., Harmeier A., Kaden D., Gottschalk K.E., Weise C., Pipkorn R., Schaefer M., Langosch D., Multhaup G. // EMBO J. 2007. V. 26. P. 1702-1712.Kienlen-Campard P., Tasiaux B., van Hees J., Li M., Huysseune S., Sato T., Fei J.Z., Aimoto S., Courtoy P.J., Smith S.O., et al. // J. Biol. Chem. 2008. V. 283. P. 7733-7744.Marenchino M., Williamson P.T., Murri S., Zandomeneghi G., Wunderli-Allenspach H., Meier B.H., Kramer S.D. // Biophys. J. 2008. V. 95. P. 1460-1473.Beel A.J., Mobley C.K., Kim H.J., Tian F., Hadziselimovic A., Jap B., Prestegard J.H., Sanders C.R. // Biochemistry. 2008. V. 47. P. 9428-9446.Curtain C.C., Ali F., Volitakis I., Cherny R.A., Norton R.S., Beyreuther K., Barrow C.J., Masters C.L., Bush A.I., Barnham K.J. // J. Biol. Chem. 2001. V. 276. P. 20466-20473.Bokvist M., Lindstrom F., Watts A., Grubner G. // J. Mol. Biol. 2004. V. 335. P. 1039-1049.Bocharova O.V., Nadezhdin K.D., Bocharov E.V., Arseniev A.S. // Bioorg. Khim. 2010. V. 36. P. 105-111.Keller R.L.J. The Computer Aided Resonance Assignment Tutorial., Goldau, Switzerland: CANTINA Verlag, 2004. 81 p.Cavanagh J., Fairbrother W.J., Palmer A.G., Skelton N.J. Protein NMR spectroscopy: principles and practice. 2nd ed. San Diego, CA, USA: Acad. Press, 2007. 886 p.Bocharov E.V., Korzhnev D.M., Blommers M.J., Arvinte T., Orekhov V.Y., Billeter M., Arseniev A.S. // J. Biol. Chem. 2002. V. 277. P. 46273-46279.Guntert P. // Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2003. V. 43. P. 105-125.Cornilescu G., Delaglio F., Bax A. // J. Biomol. NMR. 1999. V. 13. P. 289-302.Baker E.N., Hubbard R.E. // Prog. Biophys. Molec. Biol. 1984. V. 44. P. 97-179.Koradi R., Billeter M., Wuthrich K.J. // Mol. Graphics. 1996. V. 14. P. 51-55.Wagner G., Pardi A., Wuthrich K. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983. V. 105. P. 5948-5949.Daragan V.A., Mayo K.H. // Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 1997. V. 31. P. 63-105.Lazaridis T., Mallik B., Chen Y. // J. Phys. Chem. B. 2005. V. 109. P. 15098-15106.Vetrivel K.S., Thinakaran G. // Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2010. V. 1801. P. 860-867.Beel A.J., Sakakura M., Barrett P.J., Sanders C.R. // Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2010. V. 1801. P. 975-982.